Actions
Export to: EndNote | Zotero | Mendeley
Collections
This file is not currently in any collections.
Could High H98-Factor Commercial Tokamak Power Plants Use Nb–Ti Toroidal Field Coils? [dataset] Open Access
In large engineering applications, materials that can fail by brittle fracture are avoided if there are practical, ductile alterna-tives. In recent years, advances in the experimental control and shaping of fusion energy plasmas have produced confinement times that are longer than the accepted IPB98(y,2) values (i.e. higher H98-factors). Detailed understanding of these enhancements in H98-factor is not available, but values as large as 1.5 - 1.8 may be possible [1, 2]. If such high values are reliably realized, they will enable such a large reduction in the magnetic field required from the toroidal field (TF) coils that ductile Nb-Ti be-comes a possible superconducting materials choice for TF fusion energy magnets. In this paper we investigate what values of enhanced H98-factor are required to enable the commercial use of Nb-Ti TF coils in tokamaks. We have investigated the use of Nb-Ti TF coils in an ITER-like geometry, for a 500 MW net electricity producing tokamak using the PROCESS systems code [3, 4]. If we use present day Nb-Ti conductors, the minimum H98-factor required for practical power plants is 1.5. For Nb-Ti cable with a critical current density in-creased by a factor of five, the minimum falls to H98 ≈ 1.4. With this improvement for an H98 = 1.5, aspect ratio 3.1 (i.e. ITER-like geometry) tokamak, we find the cost of base-load electricity is ~ 42 % greater than if Nb3Sn is used and about 1.4 times that of a typical fission power strike price (scaled up to 2.5 GWe net electricity). | [1] B. N. Sorbom et al., "ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets," Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 100, pp. 378-405, 2015. [2] A. C. C. Sips, "Advanced scenarios for ITER operation," Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 47, no. 5A, p. A19, 2005. [3] M. Kovari, R. Kemp, H. Lux, P. Knight, J. Morris, and D. J. Ward, "“PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics," Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 3054-3069, 2014. [4] M. Kovari et al., "“PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants – Part 2: Engineering," Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 104, pp. 9-20, 2016.
Descriptions
- Resource type
- Dataset
- Contributors
- Creator:
Chislett-McDonald, S. B. L.
1
Editor: Surrey, E. 2
Editor: Hampshire, D. P. 1
1 Superconductivity Group, Centre for Materials Physics, Department of Physics, Durham University, DH1 3LE, UK
2 Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3EB, UK
- Funder
-
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Research methods
- Other description
- Keyword
- Multifilamentary superconductors
Fusion reactor design
Toroidal magnetic fields
Type II superconductors
- Subject
-
Superconductors
Fusion reactors--Design
Toroidal magnetic circuits
- Location
- Language
- English
- Cited in
- Identifier
- ark:/32150/r1fj2362110
doi:10.15128/r1fj2362110
- Rights
- All rights reserved All rights reserved
- Publisher
-
Durham University
- Date Created
-
14/03/2019
File Details
- Depositor
- S.B.L. Chislett Mcdonald
- Date Uploaded
- 20 March 2018, 12:03:42
- Date Modified
- 25 March 2019, 16:03:40
- Audit Status
- Audits have not yet been run on this file.
- Characterization
-
File format: zip (ZIP Format)
Mime type: application/zip
File size: 11643
Last modified: 2019:03:14 11:51:08+00:00
Filename: Figures_CSV.zip
Original checksum: 572592401592419ded99e266a77c74f2